John Belsher on a private jet
Editor’s note: CalCoastNews is referring to developer Ryan Petetit, who changed his name to Ryan Wright during the case, as Ryan Petetit-Wright.
By KAREN VELIE
The California Supreme Court ruled that former San Luis Obispo attorney John Belsher cannot avoid disciplinary actions by resigning with charges pending, according to the Sept. 2 ruling. The court ordered the State Bar to proceed promptly with disciplinary proceedings.
Multiple regulatory agencies took action against Belsher in 2025 leaving him unable to practice law or operate as a real estate broker in California. At the same time, federal prosecutors accused Belsher of obstructing justice in the ongoing federal investigation into corruption in SLO County, according to court records.
On April 25, 2025, the California Department of Real Estate filed an accusation against Belsher for failing to maintain a principal office in California or to report the office closure as required. The department permitted Belsher to surrender his license on Oct. 17, 2025 in connection with the disciplinary action.
“I freely and voluntarily surrender all my licenses and license rights under the Real Estate Law,” Belsher wrote. “I understand that by surrendering my license(s), the allegations in the accusation shall be deemed true and I waive all rights to a hearing and judicial review.”
On Oct. 24, 2025, California bar investigators filed 12 disciplinary charges against Belsher because his dishonest and self-serving actions damaged his clients. The notice of disciplinary charges includes allegations of corruption, dishonesty, moral turpitude and breach of fiduciary duty.
On Jan. 12, Belsher resigned from the State Bar amid disciplinary proceedings. He asked to be immediately listed as inactive.
For an attorney to resign with charges pending, approval is required from both the State Bar Court and the California Supreme Court. If accepted, resigning with charges pending effectively stops ongoing disciplinary actions.
However, on March 13, the state bar asked the California Supreme Court to reject Belsher’s request because it “would reinforce a negative rhetoric that attorneys cannot conform to their ethical and professional responsibilities and that they are able to evade discipline by resigning.”
“Respondent’s misconduct is serious as respondent’s deceitful and corrupt conduct was complex and prolonged, and it involved respondent depriving his clients of a significantly higher amount than in the referenced cases,” according to the State Bar filing. “Respondent has repeatedly failed to uphold the most basic duties of an attorney.”
On April 13, Belsher filed a response to the bar’s objection to his resignation with charges pending. However, the court rejected Belsher’s response because it exceeded the page limit and it was not in a clean format.
On June 17, Belsher filed a 66 page response he submitted directly to the California Supreme Court. Belsher argues State Bar staff failed in their obligation to reach a stipulation.
Belsher is also identified as a co-conspirator in a federal bribery case involving his former business partner Ryan Petetit-Wright and former San Luis Obispo County Supervisor Adam Hill. Petetit-Wright is currently serving a five-year prison sentence for conspiracy to commit fraud.
With Hill on the payroll, Belsher and Petetit-Wright’s PB Companies easily obtained building permits, as well as meetings with city and county staff and officials.
CalCoastNews exclusively reported in 2015 that Belsher and Petetit-Wright were paying Hill. Allegations Hill denied at the time.
Shortly after FBI agents raided Hill’s home and office, Hill committed suicide with an overdose of cocaine and antidepressants on Aug. 6, 2020.
In the 2025 federal filing, prosecutors describe Belsher and Petetit-Wright conspiring to bribe Hill, to conceal their scheme, and to obstruct justice.
Even so, law enforcement agents have not arrested Belsher. The case remains open.
Because we believe the public needs the facts, the truth, CalCoastNews has not put up a paywall because it limits readership. However, we are seeking qualification as a paper of record, which will allow us to publish public notices, this requires 5,000 paid subscribers.
Your subscription will help us to continue investigating and reporting the news.
Support CalCoastNews, subscribe today, click here.
A note to John: You have always been honest with me as a lawyer; I do not understand how your dealings with others went south but like all industries that deal with people, time is your enemy. Dealing with other people’s problems or whatever will eventually become your problem. I’m certain that there are many others that should throw in the towel before they are discovered or sucked it by our greedy world.
Makes you wonder about the timing of the Fibunes big cuts?
Tribune will ignore this, or something Schrager will keep focusing on the old CCN lawsuit. Why on earth does that paper insist on wasting ink on the Belsher family? Why can’t they acknowledge Velie’s role in exposing corruption?
The Belshers, Bernats or whatever their names are should be declared a public nuisance. The amount of tax payers dollars and court resources they have drained from the taxpayers with their shenanigans may deserve its only line item on the court and municipal budgets.
Karma is real!
So…the axe is falling on Belsher, leading the Tribune to double down on its attack and misinformation about CCN and Ms. Velie. Looks to me like these attacks are a diversionary tactic so folks miss the Trib’s ongoing support of the criminal element in SLO County.
It’s easy to dismiss the Tribune as fishwrap and ignore it. But it is the paper of record where legal noticies are filed and government agencies are required to post information. It should be more accurately described as an instrument of propaganda and misinformation. They have been complicit in subterfuge and corruption for at least a decade and need to called out for that and pay a heavy price.
The State’s limit for a response is 50 cocktail napkins.