Comments on: SLO Tribune eliminating Saturday print publication

By: RalphKane

RalphKane — Sat, 03 Aug 2019 18:10:33 +0000

In reply to malovato. Too bad we can't bring back Weyrich and the "Gazettes" LOL

By: RalphKane

RalphKane — Sat, 03 Aug 2019 18:07:41 +0000

In reply to shishkabob141. Most hard-copy papers are read by retirees who won't or can't navigate the online world.

By: Mjd

Mjd — Fri, 02 Aug 2019 05:50:49 +0000

Commie Rag.

By: malovato

malovato — Fri, 02 Aug 2019 04:24:57 +0000

It appears reading these posts that everyone considers the Tribune a rag….. I personally think the Tribune is OK, not a great read but adequate. I consider Cal Coast News the same…. I have an question and would like an honest answer. What do you people consider the best vehicle for news regarding the Central Coast?

By: Snoid

Snoid — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:53:04 +0000

Ah well……there’s always KSBY for ….ahem…in depth investigative “live and local” news. Bwahahahahahah. If you indulge in all three in the eve that’s 90 minutes a day you’ll NEVER get back.Good to know taint it ;)

By: ActaNonVerba

ActaNonVerba — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:40:48 +0000

I was a paper boy many moons ago in SLO. I delivered in my neighborhood. More than 90% took the TT (Tribune) back then…

By: slomark

slomark — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:52:27 +0000

In reply to panflash. Shut it down. But don't expect or wish for a new newspaper--the industry is already disrupted. For local news, use Google and select "Local" in the left column. It aggregates all the various news stories from here. As for the paywall at the Trib's website, when you see an article on their site you want to read, in Chrome right-click the hyperlink and say to open in a private window; in Safari right-click while holding down the Option key and say to open in a private window. This is on a Mac, but would be similar on a PC. I don't know about on IOS or Android. Once you get into the web page, you'll discover there was really nothing to read there anyway. LOL.

By: slomark

slomark — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:45:01 +0000

In reply to shelworth. shelworth: Are you talking about the democratic candidates? LOL.

By: fhill123

fhill123 — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:36:21 +0000

No great loss.

By: sweethome

sweethome — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:34:59 +0000

Let’s see…..they give less in their product
and raise the prices for a rag of a newspaper that nobody wants anyway. What could go wrong?

By: shishkabob141

shishkabob141 — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:57:01 +0000

On my early morning walk this morning I took note of the number of papers in my neighbors’ driveways…four. Four out of over 120+ homes.
Pathetic, but well deserved.

By: shelworth

shelworth — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:10:26 +0000

Great, now I have to talk to my wife at breakfast on Saturdays…

By: SLOChildrenAtPlay

SLOChildrenAtPlay — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:00:52 +0000

The only “reader truth” they should be “adjusting” to is investigating, reporting, and printing the truth. But of course not, why would they? Better to cut costs by only printing 6 days of lies.

By: shelworth

shelworth — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 13:51:56 +0000

“Well, moving to the Left politically didn’t work, who’s got a better idea?”, “Hey, I know, let’s move further to the Left!”, “Brilliant!, do it!”

By: horse_soldier

horse_soldier — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 07:43:52 +0000

One less day to read stale, slanted ‘news’.